Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
MB

METALS FOR BUILDINGS

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 84976288959-87

1
position filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1106 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Construction Products Europe (full membership)
  • CENTC350 (liaison membership)

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track METALS in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at METALS FOR BUILDINGS? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file METALS FOR BUILDINGS engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from METALS FOR BUILDINGS or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

METALS FOR BUILDINGS filed 1 position on 10 Apr 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated actfiled 10 Apr 2026PDFsource

As already reported in our response dated of 2 May 2023 about the EU Taxonomy Environmental Delegated Act on circular economy criteria for buildings, the current technical screening criteria for the construction of new buildings do not adequately support the transition to a circular economy.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from METALS FOR BUILDINGS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.