I noted the purpose is ''to help start-ups and SMEs to develop new products/services in the digital economy.'' ... OR, I run à Quick search for words on the PDF document: IPR, Intellectual, Proprety, IP, WIPO, EPO and did not find any. I do not think this legislative proposal is to destroy intellectual creativities of students, designers, authors, engineers & etc... It is not to lead new offerings available today.
MI
MEED International
Company · France · EU Transparency Register 243506831556not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track MEED in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at MEED International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
MEED International filed 2 positions between 4 Jun 2021 and 18 May 2022, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed
What they argued
Hello, Finally, a bombing against abusive AI in the cyber space also: In order for regulatory intervention at EU level to establish a high level of trust among users, thus increasing the attractiveness of EU digital products and ancillary services, I think there is a need for a kind of common validation and certification: inspired by the civil aviation industry in theory and practice of monitoring... Good for you
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put MEED International next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 49.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from MEED International’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.