EU public procurement rules should reflect the realities of modern software markets, where open source software underpins a large share of digital infrastructure and functions as long-term public infrastructure rather than a one-time product purchase. Procurement policy is a key lever for reducing vendor lock-in, increasing interoperability, and strengthening Europes control over its digital infrastructure.
LFE
Linux Foundation Europe
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 610631350643-79
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #835 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since
Declares membership of
- The Linux Foundation - https://linuxfoundation.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Linux in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Linux Foundation Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Linux Foundation Europe filed 4 positions between 12 Jan 2026 and 15 Jul 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Linux Foundation Europe welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation on the European Open Digital Ecosystems Strategy. More detailed feedback is provided in the accompanying document, while the key points are summarised as follows: 1.
The EU in the past initiated multiple instruments (cf. Gaia-X, IPCEI-CIS, ...), many EU countries invest into local digital sovereignty initiatives, somewhat not coordinated EU-wide yet (cf. numerique.gouv.fr, zendis.de and many more).
Linux Foundation Europe welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the review of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF), which has the potential of supporting open, resilient, and collaborative digital public infrastructure.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Linux Foundation Europe next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 23.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Linux Foundation Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.