Leonardo is a global leader in the aerospace, defence, and security sectors. As defence systems, aerospace platforms, and critical infrastructures become ever more integrated into the broader digital ecosystem, the regulatory framework governing electronic communications infrastructure and services increasingly impacts the sectors ability to compete and innovate.
Leonardo S.p.A.
Company · Italy · EU Transparency Register 02550382403-01
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #148 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- ASD (Aerospace and Defence Industries Association of Europe) - Confindustria - UNIFE (Association of the European Rai…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Roma, Italy
- EU office
- Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Leonardo in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Leonardo S.p.A.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Leonardo S.p.A. filed 11 positions between 21 May 2025 and 17 Sept 2026, across 9 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
Cybersecurity Act Consultation Concerning Title II: The European Union Agency For Cybersecurity Leonardo supports the revised, strengthened role and mandate of ENISA, recognising the strategic added value that the proposition will bring to the European Cybersecurity landscape.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Context 1. The White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030 issued by the European Commission last March underscores the need to create a stronger and more resilient defence industrial base also by removing obstacles related to its access to finance, including ESG investment.
Buongiorno, the following feedback is issued by the Renato Mazzamauro, the direct representative of Leonardo SPA: The CBAM has proven to be a cumbersome and bureaucratic tool from the outset. The emissions calculation system delegated to their suppliers, but with the veracity of the data under their responsibility, is a bureaucratic brake even for largely structured companies.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
The Advanced Materials Act should focus on the current missing of the entire middle value chain since apart Raw Materials that are another issue, the manufacturers of products register a missing of the entire value chain in the material production. The main issues are the following: 1) Market demand and volume 2) Time to product and scale 3) Regulatory and investment uncertainty 4) Value-chain fragmentation.
Our views and suggestions about EU Quantum Act initiative to be implemented soon can be summarised according to the following bullet list: The Quantum Act should not focus solely on funding specific innovative technical Quantum devices and ideas, e.g generated by new startups, but should primarily build up and strengthen full EU supply chains created around novel turnkey services and solutions allowed by Quantum…
Our views and suggestions about EU Quantum Act initiative to be implemented soon can be summarised according to the following bullet list: The Quantum Act should not focus solely on funding specific innovative technical Quantum devices and ideas, e.g generated by new startups, but should primarily build up and strengthen full EU supply chains created around novel turnkey services and solutions allowed by Quantum…
EU Quantum Act identifies three structural problems which may eventually jeopardize the ambition to become a global leader in Research & Innovation and industrialization of Quantum Technologies: 1. Fragmented panorama for Research & Innovation; 2. Industrial Capacity and Investment Gap; 3.
Leonardo encourages the inclusion of the e-waste and Critical Raw Material in the green list of non-hazardous waste categories that be allowed to circulate in EU with less national authorisations. The circular value chains of electric and electronics materials and of Critical Raw Materials like metals for defence (see CRM4Defence Project…
A harmonized regulatory system and multilevel governance across Member States are essential to speed troop and equipment transit, cutting authorization time spans via digital, preauthorized procedures. For effective implementation, complex challenges must be addressed organically: a) Operational integration and interoperability: across armed forces, civil authorities, managers and regulators.
AI Factories and Gigafactories: The document places great emphasis on increasing European computing capacity. It is essential to ensure effective access for European businesses and strategic sectors, particularly those requiring high levels of security and computing power.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Leonardo S.p.A. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 143.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Leonardo S.p.A.’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.