Lenovo welcomes the Commissions ambition to develop a Circular Economy Act (CEA) as a unifying framework to deliver the objectives of the Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan, and the recently adopted Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
LGL
Lenovo Group Limited
Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 217499944538-05
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #208 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€700K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2021
in the register since
Declares membership of
- DIGITAL EUROPE →
- Information Technology Industry Council
- European Schoolnet
- Agoria →
- CODE (Coalition for Open Digital Ecosystems)
- Bruegel
- Fair Standards Alliance
- Responsible Business Alliance →
- European Internet Forum (EIF)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Hong Kong, China
- EU office
- Machelen
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Lenovo in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Lenovo Group Limited? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Lenovo Group Limited filed 4 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 26 Jan 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2025 · 3 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Dear Sir or Madam, Lenovo welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions call for evidence on the evaluation of the Public Procurement Directives, including Directive 2014/24/EU. We appreciate the Commissions efforts to assess the effectiveness of the current framework in fostering competition, increasing SME participation, simplifying procurement processes, and promoting transparency in public…
Lenovo welcomes the European Commissions initiative to evaluate the EU public procurement framework. We support the objective of strengthening European competitiveness and ensuring supply chain resilience. However, based on our experience across the Single Market and available economic modelling, we urge the Commission to reconsider the introduction of horizontal "European Preference" criteria.
Lenovo welcomes the Commissions revision of the Cybersecurity Act (CSA) and supports efforts to enhance cybersecurity, simplify regulatory frameworks, and foster an open, competitive digital economy. We underline the importance of maintaining a technical, risk-based approach to ICT security, grounded in international standards, and caution against the use of non-technical criteria or measures that could undermine EU…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EDF - Electricité de France · 4 files in common
- Danish Chamber of Commerce · 4 files in common
- MedTech Europe · 4 files in common
- CPME · 4 files in common
- Eurocities · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 253.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Lenovo Group Limited’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.