Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
LEG

Legrand

Company · France · EU Transparency Register 131526296046-12

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #446 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • CECAPI
  • CAPIEL
  • Working Group on cyber, a joint working group between CECAPI and CAPIEL
  • Smart Building Alliance

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
LIMOGES, France

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Legrand in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Legrand? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Legrand engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Legrand or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Legrand filed 2 positions between 17 Jul 2025 and 31 Jul 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Revision of the Standardisation Regulationfiled 17 Jul 2025PDFsource

Legrand, global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation on the revision of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 on European standardisation. We strongly believe thatthe proposed provisions on common specifications wouldlead to the emergence of a parallel structure.

Revision of the Network Code on Requirements for Grid Connection of Generatorsfiled 31 Jul 2026source

Regarding this document, we believe it is necessary to distinguish between bidirectional AC and DC charging stations: For bidirectional DC charging stations, we have no objections to this document. When the vehicle feeds AC power directly back into the grid, the vehicle must comply with the specifications set out in this document.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 8.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Legrand’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.