Company · Estonia
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Law in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Law Office RASK? so we know who speaks for it.
Law Office RASK filed 4 positions on 26 Jan 2026, across 1 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
* Currently, contracting authorities have to spend a disproportionate amount of time in cross-border procurements to check the tax, social security and legal background of bidders registered in different Member States. There is no single system where the necessary checks can be carried out easily, securely and quickly.
Filed in Estonian · English published by the European Commission
* Article 41 provides that the prior involvement of tenderers in the preparation of the procurement must not distort competition. Although the principle is understandable, it remains unclear which participation is actually considered problematic and what are the objective criteria for assessing whether there is a potential distortion of competition.
Filed in Estonian · English published by the European Commission
* The current Article 72 of Directive 2014/24 remains too rigid and unclear, which complicates its practical implementation and leads to legal uncertainty. A provision which makes it possible to lay down the grounds for amendments in a contract is particularly problematic, but requires them to be clear, precise and unambiguous.
Filed in Estonian · English published by the European Commission
* The definition of innovation in Article 2(22) of Directive 2014/24 as it stands is too broad and can be interpreted in a way that also makes it possible to consider as innovation materially insignificant changes, such as the mere purchase of an existing product or service in a different way. This could lead to procurement being mistakenly referred to as innovation procurement without real novelty or added value.
Filed in Estonian · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Law Office RASK next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Everything on this page comes from Law Office RASK’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.