We express some concerns regarding planned Climate Law. There are already many regulatory documents in the EU regarding climate issues. Member States (MS) just have prepared National Energy and Climate Plans (NECP). Other legislation pieces, including LULUCF Regulation are in force already.
LPA
Latvian Peat Association
NGO · Latvia · EU Transparency Register 206348832825-42
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #924 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
- "Growing Media EUROPE" www.growing-media.eu/
- “Latvian Employers Confederation” (LDDK) https://lddk.lv/en/
- Latvian Agricultural Organization Cooperation Council (LAOCC) https://www.losp.lv/about-5
- Latvian Land Reclamation Association http://www.lmb-melio.lv/
- Peat Alliance
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Riga, Latvia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Latvian in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Latvian Peat Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Latvian Peat Association filed 3 positions between 5 Feb 2020 and 11 Jul 2024, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2020 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
Please find attached an opinion of Latvian Peat Association. A Regulation should not be adopted, but a Directive can be discussed. The geographical differences of the Member States should be taken into account. The restoration of ecosystems is a sensitive issue that affects the interests of many involved parties, therefore there is no need to rush, but on the contrary, flexibility is needed.
Drafting and amending EU regulations is a large-scale work that requires a lot of resources from the parties involved. Therefore, before deciding on the revision of the regulation, the information on the basis of which the LULUCF regulation and other regulatory acts are developed should be critically evaluated. It is about the IPCC methodology.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Latvian Peat Association next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 60.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Latvian Peat Association’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.