NGO · Poland · EU Transparency Register 622607199040-15
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #423 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Krajowa in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji? so we know who speaks for it.
Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji filed 4 positions between 21 Jun 2024 and 25 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
We set out the main demands and reservations about the proposed DNA Regulation, stressing the need to reduce excessive regulatory obligations and to improve the efficiency of the rules. We have set out in detail the following requests in the annex.
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
As the National Chamber of Commerce for Electronics and Telecommunications, we support the position of the Association of Signals, which we enclose in the file. The DSM Directive has significantly increased the liability of platforms for copyright infringements, including through content licensing obligations and notice and stay down mechanisms, but does not fully address the specificities of modern piracy, in…
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
In response to the call for views published by the European Commission – White Paper on how to meet Europe’s digital infrastructure needs, the National Chamber of Commerce of Electronics and Telecommunications encloses the position.
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
Audiovisual media service providers with editorial responsibility have for many years been subject to strict regulations under the audiovisual media service directive (AVMSD). The last revision of the directive in 2018 brought necessary changes that were meant to reflect the evolving landscape of audiovisual content consumption and distribution.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 136.
Everything on this page comes from Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.