Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
JIP

Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative

Other · Denmark · EU Transparency Register 2193353101990-53

5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Jazhara in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 5 files, from Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative filed 5 positions between 14 Jan 2026 and 2 Feb 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Fair labour mobility packagefiled 2 Feb 2026source

While this is a strong and welcome proposal, it appears to lack a clear framework for preventing double taxation. This is particularly important for cross-border workers, as the absence or insufficiency of double taxation treaties can create significant financial and administrative barriers.

2026 Strategic Foresight Reportfiled 14 Jan 2026source

The EUs strategic foresight should begin from the recognition that the global environment has entered a phase of persistent systemic competition in which economic, technological, informational, and security domains are increasingly weaponised. The erosion of the post-WWII multilateral order is not temporary, and a return to previous assumptions of stability should not be the baseline for long-term planning. 1.

Simplifying defence and sensitive security procurementfiled 2 Feb 2026source

I commend the proposed revision of the Defence Procurement Directive as a significant step toward simplifying and modernizing defence procurement in the EU. However, I would like to emphasize that the initiative could be further strengthened by integrating two complementary measures: An EU-Funded Research and Development (R&D) Program An EU Strategic Reserve for Weapons, Systems, Ammunition, and Material 1.

Fair labour mobility package: European social security passfiled 2 Feb 2026source

While ESSPASS will significantly improve the verification and coordination of social security rights, there is a risk that increased efficiency could unintentionally entrench entitlement frameworks that deter free movement in practice.

Communication on the defence single market: EU technological base fit for futurefiled 2 Feb 2026source

I welcome the Communication on the Defence Single Market as a timely and necessary step toward strengthening Europes defence capabilities. However, the proposal overlooks the most direct and effective solution to the challenges of fragmentation, inefficiency, and external dependency: the creation of a joint EU military development budget and the establishment of a European Union Strategic Reserve of Material and…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 18.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Jazhara Independent Paneuropean Policy Initiative’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.