ISOPA (The European Trade Association for the Producers of Diisocyanates and Polyols) welcomes the Commission's intention to come forward with a proposal for a Circular Economy Act. Such a measure can play a significant role in advancing Europe's circular transition by creating an enabling and predictable policy framework. For a detailed position and policy recommendations, please find ISOPA's feedback attached.
ISO
ISOPA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 00770563312-18
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #833 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since
Declares membership of
- ISOPA is a partner of CEFIC ( European Chemical Industry Council).
- ISOPA is member in the Deutscher Wirtschaftsrat
- ISOPA is member of Federation of European & International Association established in Belgium
- ISOPA is member of the Modern Building Alliance
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Diisocyanate and Polyol Producers Association (ISOPA)
- Head office
- Brussel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ISOPA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ISOPA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ISOPA filed 4 positions between 21 Mar 2022 and 5 Nov 2025, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
2022 · 2 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
ISOPA, the Association of Diisocyanates and Polyols Producers, shares the vision of a Circular Economy and is committed to the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. We welcome the opportunity to provide comments feeding into the upcoming Ecodesign Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), formerly known as the Sustainable Products Initiative (SPI).
ISOPA and ALIPA welcome the European Commissions proposal to amend the Chemical Agents Directive (CAD) 98/24/EC to establish binding EU Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL) for diisocyanates. Today, EU Member States have different OEL levels for individual diisocyanates across the Union and some even have no limit value at all.
ISOPA/ALIPA and its downstream users’ associations welcome the opportunity to provide feedback to the European Commission on the review of the Chemical Agents Directive (98/24/EC) which intends to set Binding Occupational Exposure Limit Values (BOEL) for diisocyanates and lead. We will not comment on the OEL setting intentions regarding lead.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ISOPA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 116.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ISOPA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.