The International AI Governance Association (IAGA) welcomes the European Commissions continued efforts to strengthen the Unions cybersecurity framework and align it with the realities of an increasingly complex threat environment. The proposal reflects a thoughtful attempt to simplify compliance, improve coherence across regulatory instruments, and enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure.
IAG
International AI Governance Association
Industry association · Switzerland · EU Transparency Register 4348632103878-81
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #818 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2026
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://intaigovassoc.org/who-we-are
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Geneva, Switzerland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track International in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at International AI Governance Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
International AI Governance Association filed 2 positions between 11 May 2026 and 12 May 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
The International AI Governance Association (IAGA) welcomes the European Commissions continued efforts to strengthen the Unions cybersecurity framework and align it with the realities of an increasingly complex threat environment. The proposal reflects a thoughtful attempt to simplify compliance, improve coherence across regulatory instruments, and enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from International AI Governance Association’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.