Overall, IIGCC welcomes the Commission's proposed revisions of the SFDR. The proposals account for feedback from financial market participants, better recognise the critical role of transition-related investment strategies, and addressing implementation issues.
IIG
Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change
NGO · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 962717910722-61
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #280 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
3.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€1.3M+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2013
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Member of the Investor Agenda Policy Working Group
- Marrakesh Partnership – Co-lead of the Finance Working Group (global focus)
- Member of Net Zero Taskforce, led by PRI
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- London, United kingdom
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Institutional in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change filed 3 positions between 23 Feb 2024 and 5 Feb 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
IIGCC supports the broad aims of the SFDR review, which should help to address usability and implementation challenges while also preserving the Regulations objectives to promote transparency and channel finance towards sustainability-focused investment strategies.
This feedback was developed in collaboration with a number of IIGCC members but does not necessarily represent the views of the entire membership, either individually or collectively. Priorities: Permitting. Accelerated permitting both for new renewable energy construction and for grid infrastructure.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- WWF European Policy Office · 2 files in common
- ClientEarth · 2 files in common
- Cassa Depositi e Prestiti (CDP) · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.