Inland waterways are essential to Europes economy, society and environment. They provide transport and logistics for industry, safeguard drinking water, supply water to industry and agriculture, support energy generation, protect biodiversity, and mitigate floods.
INE
Inland Navigation Europe
Other · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 1811573195-25
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 56 associations and networks of public authorities on this site, they rank #20 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2008
in the register since
- Register category
- Associations and networks of public authorities
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Inland in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Inland Navigation Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Inland Navigation Europe filed 3 positions between 14 Sept 2021 and 4 Sept 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
Inland Navigation Europe (INE) underlines the strategic importance of the CEF2 programme for transport (as the CEF1 programme before), for supporting the implementation of the EU TEN-T goals regarding the inland waterways network and its connections to other modes. CEF is absolutely a relevant and indispensable tool for achieving its policy objectives.
(I) efficiency of navigation and traffic management • More flexible and smoother procedure of technical standards adoption and subsequent adaptation is required. To this end, we fully support the idea to involve a dedicated standardization body such as CESNI. It should be organized in a way that enables faster updates of RIS standards when required.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EDF - Electricité de France · 2 files in common
- Groupe RATP · 2 files in common
- Bentley Systems · 2 files in common
- European Barge Union EBU · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Inland Navigation Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.