This response provides INGs key recommendations to simplify the digital regulatory framework in key areas for the banking sector. Our aim is to reduce the compliance burden while maintaining the underlying policy objectives, including resilience as a core consideration.
IG
ING Group
Company · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 12112965774-95
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #402 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€600K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
4
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since
Declares membership of
- ING is a member of:
- Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME)
- Belgische Federatie van de Financiële Sector – Fédération belge du Secteur Financier (Febelfin)
- Betaalvereniging Nederland
- Nederlandse Vereniging van Banken (NVB)
- Bruegel →
- Bundesverband deutscher banken (BDB)
- Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)
- Digital Europe →
- Eurofi
- European Banking Federation (EBF)
- European Covered Bond Council/European Mortgage Federation (ECBC/EMF)
- and 11 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Amsterdam, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ING in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ING Group? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ING Group filed 4 positions between 11 Sept 2020 and 3 Feb 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 1 filed2021 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
ING welcomes the opportunity to provide input on how to foster open digital ecosystems in Europe, given the importance and widespread use of open-source software, also in the banking community. ING considers that open source delivers the most value when three parts work together: i. Open code keeps the source available so it can be reviewed, fixed, and maintained over time, ii.
ING fully subscribes the importance of instant payment for the EU internal market. We believe it is crucial to process payments – both national and cross-border within the SEPA area - for citizens and companies in Europe in a real-time, reliable, cost-efficient and secure way as backbone for enabling pan-European market initiatives based on instant payments.
ING Bank is pleased to offer its feedback in response to the Commission’s proposals on changes to the MiFID II rules for research. We have divided our response into two parts, one addressing the aspects of the proposals relating to fixed income research and another part for the aspects relating to equity research.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ING Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 42.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ING Group’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.