Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
IA

INEOS Automotive

Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 344826112965-44

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #432 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2014
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • A full list of associations and voluntary initiatives that INEOS participates in can be found on our website: https:/…

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Registered as
INEOS AG (INEOS)
Head office
Rolle, Switzerland

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track INEOS in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at INEOS Automotive? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files INEOS Automotive engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from INEOS Automotive or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

INEOS Automotive filed 2 positions between 20 May 2024 and 9 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 20 May 2024PDFsource

INEOS Automotive welcomes the publication of a methodology to evaluate the carbon footprint of batteries which can enable customers and businesses to compare different products in an effective way. After detailed review, we would like to highlight three main areas of concern in the proposed methodology: (1) Its applicability to different vehicle technologies, (2) that this proposed model favours vehicles with larger…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 9.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from INEOS Automotive’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.