We would like to support the draft Ecodesign and Energy Labelling regulations and particularly the new energy efficiency formulas, which are less linear and steep with capacity, thus avoiding the current encouragement to ever larger capacities. We also welcome the provisions to avoid programmes with too stretched durations, with a preference for the cap on duration in Ecodesign over indication on the energy label.
iFixit
Company · Germany
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track iFixit in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at iFixit? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
iFixit filed 4 positions between 12 Feb 2018 and 21 Nov 2018, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Our views on the Commission’s proposal are summarised in the attached paper: https://goo.gl/7XeaF8 We are in favour of Option 4 because Ecodesign & Energy Labelling requirements for household washing machines and washer driers help mitigate climate change, help EU citizens save on their bills, and we strongly support the Commission’s intention to better integrate domestic appliances in a Circular Economy through the…
The inception impact assessment document provides a very good introduction to the topic, and we are very supportive of most of the statements made. The best policy option for consumers and the environment is indeed option 3. We would like to insist on three key points: 1/ Ecodesign requirements should be pursued, but thoroughly revised and reinforced to better reflect current technologies and practices.
The inception impact assessment document provides a very good introduction to the topic, and we are very supportive of most of the statements made. The best policy option for consumers and the environment is indeed option 3. We would like to insist on three key points: 1/ Ecodesign requirements should be pursued, but thoroughly revised and reinforced to better reflect current technologies and practices.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- European Environmental Bureau · 3 files in common
- ECOS · 3 files in common
- Legambiente · 3 files in common
- Friends of the Earth - France · 3 files in common
- Friends of the Earth Germany (BUND) · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 11.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from iFixit’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.