Cities and regions recognise the ambitious policy reforms that have established the European Union as a global leader in the circular economy over the last decade. However, both material use and waste generation show no signs of a significant reduction in the EU: this indicates that the EU has not yet transitioned to a low material intensity and less wasteful circular economy.
ICLEI Europe
NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 064034733055-88
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 56 associations and networks of public authorities on this site, they rank #3 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- https://iclei-europe.org/partnerships/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Associations and networks of public authorities
- Registered as
- ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability European Secretariat (ICLEI)
- Head office
- Freiburg, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ICLEI in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ICLEI Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ICLEI Europe filed 10 positions between 22 Feb 2024 and 12 Jun 2026, across 10 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
ICLEI Europe, as a network of local governments, welcomes the opportunity to reflect upon the 2014 EU Procurement Directives, and in particular their effectiveness in promoting strategic and sustainable public procurement (SPP). Our submission highlights both the impact achieved by SPP in the period 2016-24, and challenges associated with the current regulatory framework.
Public Procurement must evolve from an administrative process into a strategic instrument to advance EU competitiveness, innovation, resilience, climate, circularity and social objectives. While the 2014 framework enables such use in principle, the Commissions evaluation and ICLEI Europes experience show that implementation remains limited: lowest-price awards dominate, strategic procedures are rarely used, sectoral…
ICLEI Europe welcomes the Commissions initiative to develop a Right to Stay Strategy. The initiative comes at a crucial moment for Europe, as many territories face overlapping pressures: demographic decline, ageing, lack of economic opportunities, climate risks, environmental degradation, housing unaffordability, weak access to services, and declining trust in public institutions.
ICLEI highlights that local and regional governments are uniquely positioned to respond to interconnected and complex environmental, economic and social challenges such as housing. Considering that around 90% of today's buildings will still exist in 2050, European policies and investments in this field should focus on high-quality, sustainable, and energy-efficient housing that is affordable and supports inclusive…
ICLEI Europe welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop an integrated European Climate Resilience and Risk Management Framework. Building on decades of support for local and regional governments, ICLEI stresses the need for a bold, cross-cutting approach that safeguards communities and nature, secures prosperity, and boosts Europes competitiveness amid growing climate risks.
It is imperative that local governments have a say in the allocation of renewable energy acceleration zones. Given the very high number of local governments in Europe, and particularly in some Member States, such participation could be facilitated on the regional level by the relevant planning authorities with the input of local/regional energy agencies.
The revision of the Governance Regulation is a timely opportunity to strengthen delivery of the EUs climate and energy objectives by improving implementation, investment clarity and coordination across governance levels.
ICLEI Europe welcomes the Implementing Act and appreciates the transparent process that guided its development. However, to support effective and successful implementation, we would like to offer several key recommendations: - Survey/transport model in indicator SU.2 (Number of trips per month made by persons who have their usual residence in the geographical area, broken down by the following four travel modes…
In regard to the next Multiannual Financial Framework, ICLEI Europe highlights that for reforms and investments to deliver tangible results across all European territories, two conditions are essential: robust multilevel governance and territorially sensitive performance indicators. Without these, the EU risks misaligned priorities, weaker implementation, and growing territorial disparities.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Eurocities · 7 files in common
- European Environmental Bureau · 6 files in common
- Council of European Municipalities and Regions · 6 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 5 files in common
- Bellona Europa · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 337.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ICLEI Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.