NGO · Slovakia · EU Transparency Register 864069599691-89
1
position filed
in the 665 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #942 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Humánny pokrok o.z.
Head office
Bratislava, Slovakia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
We support the inclusion of stunning by non-penetrative strike in the head, as scientific evidence shows that EFSA can ensure immediate loss of consciousness and possibly death when properly used. We do not support the introduction of a high nitrogen expansion foam mixture (NEFS).
Filed in Slovak · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Humánny pokrok next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Humánny pokrok’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.