Europe has already demonstrated that it can generate world-class biotechnology innovation. The next challenge is ensuring that these innovations can be deployed, financed and manufactured at industrial scale within Europe.
GCN
Groene Chemie Nieuwe Economie
Other · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 6538674101235-15
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #242 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Declares membership of
- https://groenechemie.nl/nl/kaart
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Stichting Platform groene chemie nieuwe economie (GCNE)
- Head office
- Groningen, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Groene in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Groene Chemie Nieuwe Economie? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Groene Chemie Nieuwe Economie filed 3 positions between 11 Nov 2025 and 10 Jun 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
Feedback on the draft Implementing Regulation on end-of-waste criteria for plastic waste. We support EU-wide end-of-waste criteria as a key enabler of a functioning recyclate market. To maximise impact, we recommend formally integrating harmonised self-assessment-based material declarations (with verification), anchored in EU standards, and pairing this regulation with strong demand-side measures.
The regulation of companies in difficulty should be adapted and preferably simplified so that the startups and scale-ups discussed have better access to grant instruments intended precisely for this stage in the innovation chain. Several avenues of solution can be envisaged under Article 2 (18). We call for a solution path to be developed as a matter of urgency. We have taken note of the following suggestions: 1.
Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 2 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 2 files in common
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 2 files in common
- Confederazione Nazionale Coldiretti · 2 files in common
- BASF SE · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 17.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Groene Chemie Nieuwe Economie’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.