Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
GH

Green Home

NGO · MNE

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Green in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Green Home? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Green Home engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Green Home or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Green Home filed 2 positions between 31 Mar 2020 and 4 Aug 2020, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 31 Mar 2020source

Green Home from Montenegro strongly supports stringent carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) for all ETS sectors, especially electricity production and trade. Montenegro, as a country heavily dependent on coal energy production, is therefore depend on the only thermal power plant it has, located in Pljevlja Municipality – responsible for the major economic, environmental and social issues that Montenegro is…

Persistent organic pollutantsfiled 4 Aug 2020source

The EU POPs Regulation should respect the objectives and requirements of the Stockholm Convention and should therefore not lead to or promote the recycling of POPs waste. This may be the case if the defined limits for the content of POPs in waste are too benevolent and if their setting is based more on the economic interests of industrial groups than on the protection of public health and the environment.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Green Home next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 7.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Green Home’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.