NGO · Canada
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 657 consultation files tracked so far (57,479 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Global in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Global Unions’ Committee on Workers’ Capital (CWC)? so we know who speaks for it.
Global Unions’ Committee on Workers’ Capital (CWC) filed 2 positions between 1 Apr 2026 and 3 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 657 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
This document contains detailed comments on the draft revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Materiality. A major point to be criticized is the large role that materiality plays in the Set 1 ESRS, which has been increased even further in the draft revised ESRS.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
In general terms, we consider that the proposal goes beyond the mere simplification of rules and, in several areas, moves closer to deregulation of the current framework, with potential risks in terms of reduced transparency and increased greenwashing. At the same time, we also recognise some positive elements, which are reflected in the comments below: 1.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Global Unions’ Committee on Workers’ Capital (CWC) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 55.
Everything on this page comes from Global Unions’ Committee on Workers’ Capital (CWC)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.