A response from Global Canopy 1) Ensure a robust materiality assessment for nature-related issues: a) Clarify that the determination of which activities are a significant driver of impacts, risks or opportunities (ESRS 1 para 90), must be based on a robust materiality assessment.
GC
Global Canopy
Other · United Kingdom
2
positions filed
in the 657 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 657 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 657 consultation files tracked so far (57,479 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Global in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Global Canopy? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Global Canopy filed 2 positions between 4 Mar 2020 and 3 Jun 2026, across 2 of the 657 legislative files tracked here.
2020 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Global Canopy welcomes the Inception Impact Assessment’s recognition of the need to address Europe’s deforestation footprint linked to commodity imports. Agricultural expansion is a major driver of deforestation, with serious consequences for the climate and for biodiversity.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Global Canopy next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 8.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Global Canopy’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.