Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
GFE

Glass Fibre Europe

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 635608817518-09

1
position filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1059 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Glass in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Glass Fibre Europe? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Glass Fibre Europe engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Glass Fibre Europe or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Glass Fibre Europe filed 1 position on 8 Jun 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Revision of the benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances (2026-2030)filed 8 Jun 2026PDFsource

For the European glass fibre industry, the proposed 2026-2030 product benchmark for continuous filament glass fibre products (t CO2/melted t of glass) would have damaging and counterproductive effects. It significantly diverges from the industrys actual GHG intensity, thereby further exacerbating already negative profitability and de facto reducing the sectors capacity to invest.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Glass Fibre Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.