We agree with the ultimate scope for setting ecodesign requirements about sustainable products but, at the same time, we would like to share our opinions regarding some parts deemed as critical. In the following senteces, you can find a summary of what we have written in the attached file.
GS
Giacomini Spa
Company · Italy
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Giacomini in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Giacomini Spa? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Giacomini Spa filed 2 positions between 21 Jun 2022 and 11 Jul 2022, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
1) Considering the numberless environmental requirements imposed by the different European standards (REACH, EPBD, SPPI, CPR,… etc), we wish to underline that these must necessarily overlap. 2) It is necessary to clarify the definition of “USED construction product” and who is the real responsible of performance and conformity of it.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Giacomini Spa next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 48.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Giacomini Spa’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.