Please see attached FIA's response to the European Commissions consultation on the cybersecurity act (CSA). FIA welcomes the Commission's stakeholder engagement to ensure improved and fit-for-purpose cyber risk management rules apply to financial entities. We recommend cyber risk management rules should apply from one ruleset if there is overlap and/or the same objectives.
FIA
FIA
Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 803137414612-21
7
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 665 tracked
6
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #547 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2014
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Member of European Capital Markets Institute (ECMI)
- Member of QED
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Futures Industry Association, Inc. (FIA)
- Head office
- Washington, United states
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track FIA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FIA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
FIA filed 7 positions between 4 Apr 2021 and 8 Apr 2026, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
2021 · 1 filed2022 · 2 filed2023 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
FIA is the leading global trade organization for the futures, options and centrally cleared derivatives markets, with offices in Brussels, London, Singapore and Washington, D.C. FIA’s membership includes clearing firms, exchanges, clearinghouses, trading firms and commodities specialists from about 50 countries as well as technology vendors, law firms and other professional service providers.
The Futures Industry Association (FIA) and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) (together the Associations) welcome the opportunity to comment on the European Commission’s (EC) proposal to review the Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR), in particular with respect to reforms of the mandatory buy-in regime (MBI) under Article 7 CSDR.
ISDA and FIA (the ‘Associations’) welcome the opportunity to provide feedback to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the CSDR inception impact assessment (Roadmap). The Associations welcome the opportunity to provide their views to the EC on revising the CSDR framework, especially regarding the scope of the mandatory buy-in requirements as part of the Settlement Discipline Regime (SDR).
Dear Sirs, The co-signed associations FIA, FIA EPTA and ISDA appreciate the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions REMIT proposal. We support the recent changes to the original proposal made in the latest Council text dated 5th May but would like to highlight some additional concerns that remain. In particular, we recommend: 1.
For the High expansion foam method, the scope could also concerned turkeys, guinea fowls and ducks. We would like to share the following opinion about Commission's proposal regarding adding high expansion nitrogen foam as a method for depopulation: The inclusion of high-expansion nitrogen foam as an additional method for killing could provide a valuable tool for managing outbreaks of diseases such as avian influenza…
FIA supports open, transparent and competitive markets. We seek to protect and enhance the integrity of the financial system, and promote high standards of professional conduct. FIA represents a wide array of market participants from around the world that depend on these markets including exchanges, clearinghouses, executing brokers, clearing members, software vendors, specialized legal firms, proprietary trading…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put FIA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 23.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FIA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.