We appreciate and support the ambitious goals of the Strategy, particularly: 1)Protection of natural and old growth forests. Designation of old and natural forest criteria, should be implemented according to scientific definitions, in consultations with scientists and NGOs; 2) Effective protection of European wetlands. Restoration should be understood as a abandoning the drainage of the marshes and peatland sites.
FOTA4Climate
NGO · Poland
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track FOTA4Climate in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FOTA4Climate? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
FOTA4Climate filed 3 positions between 26 Nov 2020 and 2 Dec 2020, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The EU call for planting 3 billion additional trees cannot be implemented in forests and on marginal agricultural land only (not enough planting space). As part of nature restoration efforts, trees should be planted on road verges, canal and river banks, dikes and dams, urban streets - where technically feasible. Preservation of existing trees should be required in procedures for road construction projects.
We strongly support the option to strengthen the current LULUCF regulation and increase its ambition in line with 2030. The EU should aim to double the absorption of CO2 by sinks by 2030. More ambitious goal of doubling CO2 removal through sinks should be achieved by: - successive implementation of the EU Biodiversity strategy for 2030 – strict protection of old and natural forests that are much more effective in…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put FOTA4Climate next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 38.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FOTA4Climate’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.