NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 846795818801-87
3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1068 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #422 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
Deutscher Naturschutzring (www.dnr.de/index.html)
European Trade Justice Coalition
German NGO-coalition working on Resource Politics/Raw Materials (AK Rohstoffe)
Initiative Konzernmacht beschränken
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Berlin, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung filed 3 positions between 18 Nov 2021 and 5 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
In the light of the current proposal on CBAM, we would like to reiterate a number of points which are essential to make the instrument both ambitious in terms of climate policy from our point of view and, at the same time, to be particularly cautious with regard to the countries of the Global South.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The producer responsibility included in the draft must be significantly extended and more actors required. It is not clear why manufacturers of industrial chemicals should not make their contribution to the purification of waste water, as these chemicals also explicitly also, as a result of their persistence, usually have a negative impact on waste water and therefore on humans and the environment.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Biocidal products are designed to kill or limit pests and unwanted microorganisms, meaning their function inherently involves harming living organisms. Although we recognise the benefits for public health and the protection of materials, their release into the environment and the resulting exposure of non-target organisms - including humans - cannot be fully avoided.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.