Trade union · France · EU Transparency Register 450237130724-04
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #98 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Fédération in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Fédération Nationale Bovine? so we know who speaks for it.
Fédération Nationale Bovine filed 7 positions between 23 Jun 2022 and 7 May 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
The Fédération Nationale Bovine (Fédération Nationale Bovine) supports the overall aspect of the European Commission’s approach to nature restoration, in particular the desire to harmonise European frameworks for agro-ecological transition, in order to limit distortions of competition.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
A proposal against the objectives of the green deal for cattle farming! This revision of the rules on INDUSTRIAL emissions is not adapted to cattle farms and will have a negative and counterproductive effect on the environment. It is therefore appropriate, as is the case at present, to retain the exclusion of cattle farms from this legislation.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Fédération Nationale Bovine (National Bovine Federation) and the Fédération Nationale des Producteurs de Milk (National Federation of Milk Producers) advocate, in the context of the revision of the IED Regulation, keeping cattle farms outside the scope of the scheme. Integration into the FDI mechanism would represent costly normative inflation, contrary to the recent simplifications undertaken by the Commission.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
For the Fédération Nationale Bovine, the ‘do no significant harm’ (DNSH) principle does not apply to national and regional partnership plans (NRPP), and in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP). NRPP, and in particular the CAP, are already subject to stringent environmental conditionality, through the protective practices proposed in the post-2027 draft CAP.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
From a general point of view, the FNB welcomes the European Commission’s (EC) proposal to amend the CMO Regulation in a targeted manner. The resumption of the construction of the running price, like the French EGAlim law, while taking into account national production costs, could contribute to securing farmers’ income and the volume employed. However, some of the proposed measures need to be clarified.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Fédération Nationale Bovine welcomes the European Commission’s proposal as a signal of its awareness of the need to simplify the legislation applied to producers. Farmers’ protests in 2024, all over Europe, highlighted the pressure on their daily lives and occupations that are overburdened by administrative requirements.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Contribution of the National Bovine Federation (FNB) to EFSA animal welfare studies (2017-2024): EFSA provides opinions to advise European organisations when constructing legislation. For this purpose, this body is based on studies and expert opinions that are sometimes very specific and often disconnected from the land realities and farming practices of European producers, which have to cope with ever more…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Fédération Nationale Bovine next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 122.
Everything on this page comes from Fédération Nationale Bovine’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.