Other · France · EU Transparency Register 450237130724-04
5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #53 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
FNSEA : https://www.fnsea.fr/
CNE
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
FEDERATION NATIONALE BOVINE (FNB)
Head office
PARIS, France
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
The Fédération Nationale Bovine (National Bovine Federation) and the Fédération Nationale des Producteurs de Milk (National Federation of Milk Producers) advocate, in the context of the revision of the IED Regulation, keeping cattle farms outside the scope of the scheme. Integration into the FDI mechanism would represent costly normative inflation, contrary to the recent simplifications undertaken by the Commission.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
For the Fédération Nationale Bovine, the ‘do no significant harm’ (DNSH) principle does not apply to national and regional partnership plans (NRPP), and in particular the common agricultural policy (CAP). NRPP, and in particular the CAP, are already subject to stringent environmental conditionality, through the protective practices proposed in the post-2027 draft CAP.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
From a general point of view, the FNB welcomes the European Commission’s (EC) proposal to amend the CMO Regulation in a targeted manner. The resumption of the construction of the running price, like the French EGAlim law, while taking into account national production costs, could contribute to securing farmers’ income and the volume employed. However, some of the proposed measures need to be clarified.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The Fédération Nationale Bovine welcomes the European Commission’s proposal as a signal of its awareness of the need to simplify the legislation applied to producers. Farmers’ protests in 2024, all over Europe, highlighted the pressure on their daily lives and occupations that are overburdened by administrative requirements.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Contribution of the National Bovine Federation (FNB) to EFSA animal welfare studies (2017-2024): EFSA provides opinions to advise European organisations when constructing legislation. For this purpose, this body is based on studies and expert opinions that are sometimes very specific and often disconnected from the land realities and farming practices of European producers, which have to cope with ever more…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from FNB’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.