a) Currently, a lot of regulatory uncertainty remains on the future of fossil boilers versus heat pumps. This could be resolved by revising the Ecolabelling framework so that fossil fuel boilers cannot receive an A-label and only appliances with efficiency above 100% (on higher heating value) should qualify for top-tier labels. b) Devices without a water storage tank, are often sold as heating only.
FEC
Flemish Energy and Climate Agency
Public authority · Belgium
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Flemish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Flemish Energy and Climate Agency? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Flemish Energy and Climate Agency filed 4 positions on 14 Jan 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
a) Currently, a lot of regulatory uncertainty remains on the future of fossil boilers versus heat pumps. This could be resolved by revising the Ecolabelling framework so that fossil fuel boilers cannot receive an A-label and only appliances with efficiency above 100% (on higher heating value) should qualify for top-tier labels. b) Devices without a water storage tank, are often sold as heating only.
a) Currently, a lot of regulatory uncertainty remains on the future of fossil boilers versus heat pumps. This could be resolved by revising the Ecolabelling framework so that fossil fuel boilers cannot receive an A-label and only appliances with efficiency above 100% (on higher heating value) should qualify for top-tier labels. b) Devices without a water storage tank, are often sold as heating only.
a) Currently, a lot of regulatory uncertainty remains on the future of fossil boilers versus heat pumps. This could be resolved by revising the Ecolabelling framework so that fossil fuel boilers cannot receive an A-label and only appliances with efficiency above 100% (on higher heating value) should qualify for top-tier labels. b) Devices without a water storage tank, are often sold as heating only.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- ECOS · 4 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 4 files in common
- Association of the European Heating Industry (EHI) · 4 files in common
- EPEE · 4 files in common
- Cool Heating Coalition · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 45.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Flemish Energy and Climate Agency’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.