Zu 1. Einführung Schon die Aufzählung der anderen Einflüsse auf die Fischbestände ist unvollständig. Es fehlen die Prädatoren wie Seehund und Kormoran deren Bestände sich in der Ostsee stark erhöht haben. Zu 2. Fortschritte beim Erreichen des höchstmöglichen Dauerertrags Auch die generelle Feststellung, dass mehr Fischbestände nachhaltig befischt werden und hier Fortschritte zu verzeichnen sind trifft für die Ostsee…
FSH
Fischereischutzverband Schleswig-Holstein
Industry association · Germany · EU Transparency Register 565870432116-54
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #117 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade unions and professional associations
- Head office
- Schönberg, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Fischereischutzverband in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Fischereischutzverband Schleswig-Holstein? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Fischereischutzverband Schleswig-Holstein filed 3 positions between 25 Jan 2024 and 13 Jul 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
2024 · 2 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
Generell konnte sich die Anwendung des MSY-Prinzips als Grundlage für die nachhaltige Bewirtschaftung von Fischbeständen nicht bewähren, weil die Berechnungsgrundlagen bei der Einführung unvollständig waren. Es fehlten in der Berechnung die Rückwürfe in der Schleppnetzfischerei. die zu dieser Zeit noch weit über 20% lagen.
The poor status of the Baltic Sea and some fish stocks is quite well described. Unfortunately, for the reasons given, the sharply increased influence of predators such as cormorants and hop dog are not properly taken into account and are not included in all fishing opportunities calculations.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Seas At Risk · 3 files in common
- CNPMEM · 3 files in common
- European Association of fish Producers Organisations (EAPO) · 3 files in common
- Mediterranean Advisory Council (MEDAC) · 2 files in common
- Baltic Sea Advisory Council · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Fischereischutzverband Schleswig-Holstein’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.