Finnish Marine Industries position for EU ETS: EU ETS should be evaluated from the view of a competitive, sustainable and efficient European waterborne transport and ensure coherence between the IMO Net Zero Framework and the FuelEU Maritime Regulation. EU ETS should be extended to cover emissions from smaller ships (i.e. between 400 GT and 5.000 GT).
FMI
Finnish Marine Industries
Industry association · Finland · EU Transparency Register 572641029342-26
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1098 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€300K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
- SEA Europe →
- Waterborne Technology Platform
- Teknologiateollisuus ry / Technology Industries of Finland
- Meriliitto
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Helsinki, Finland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Finnish in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Finnish Marine Industries? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Finnish Marine Industries filed 2 positions between 3 Jul 2025 and 16 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
The Arctic is undergoing rapid geopolitical, environmental and economic change. Climate change, emerging maritime transport routes and access to natural resources are reshaping the regions dynamics. A resilient Arctic policy should therefore contribute simultaneously to environmental protection, resilience, technological leadership and the stability of Europes northern regions.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Finnish Marine Industries next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 9.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Finnish Marine Industries’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.