Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
In view of the upcoming revision of the European Standardisation Regulation 1025/2012, the following elements should be considered: It is essential for the European Commission to speed up the deadlines for citing standards in the Official Journal of the European Union: — European industry, in collaboration with other interest groups, is investing heavily in the development of standards to ensure that they support…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
In the light of the proposal for European Omnibus legislation, the following elements should be considered: The European regulatory model based on the New Legislative Framework (NLF), complemented by Market Surveillance, has proven to be an ideal way to foster innovation and the placing of safe products in the Internal Market.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from FEGECA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.