Federations of Swedish Farmers, LRF, feedback on 2014/24/EU the Public Procurement Directive LRF welcomes the European Commission's initiative to launch a call for evidence and public consultation to evaluate on 2014/24/EU the Public Procurement Directive and LRF would like to submit feedback below.
Federation of Swedish Farmers
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 79239225070-38
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #151 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- COPA COGECA: European agricultural union
- https://copa-cogeca.eu/
- EDA European Dairy Association - LRF Mjölk
- CEPF
- CETTAR
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Lantbrukarnas Riksförbund (LRF)
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Federation in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Federation of Swedish Farmers? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Federation of Swedish Farmers filed 10 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 23 Jun 2026, across 9 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) welcomes the European Commission's initiative to launch a call for evidence and public consultation regarding the forthcoming revision of the European Unions public procurement framework. LRF is a non-partisan interest and business organisation for people and companies in the green industries.
The revision of Regulation (EU) 2018/848 is an important opportunity to introduce targeted improvements. The organic framework plays a valuable role for organic production and consumer confidence, but several rules are overly rigid, create legal uncertainty and impose unnecessary administrative and economic burdens.
The rules for organic production are unfortunately often perceived as difficult to understand, costly to apply, and overly detailed. The proportion of organic laying hens in Sweden has decreased from around 18% to just over 10% in recent years. This proportion will likely further decline when the transition period for organic pullet production ends and the rules on outdoor access for pullets come into force.
The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for Evidence and highlights the crucial role of agriculture and forestry in Europes renewable energy transition. Representing 120,000 members and 60,000 enterprises, LRF emphasizes that a secure, competitive and sustainable energy system depends on active engagement from citizens, businesses and all Member States.
The Environmental Omnibus provides an important opportunity to introduce further simplification measures across EU environmental legislation, including in the revised Industrial Emissions Directive (IED). Without additional targeted simplifications, there is a significant risk that the revised framework will impose disproportionate administrative burdens on livestock farming, create legal uncertainty and undermine…
The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) represents 120,000 members and 60,000 enterprises in agriculture and forestry. It is Swedens largest small business organisation, including cooperatives like Södra, Mellanskog, Norra Skog, Lantmännen, and Arla. LRF is also a member of Copa-Cogeca, CEPF, and NSF.
The Federation of Swedish Farmers is an interest and business organization for agriculture and family forestry in Sweden. With almost 128 000 individual members and some 65 000 enterprises we are the largest organization for small enterprises in Sweden. We are also members of Copa Cogeca. We are grateful to the Commission that we have been given this opportunity to provide our feed-back on Plant variety rights.
The Federation of Swedish Farmers promote the introduction of remote meat inspection in smaller slaughterhouses and game handling facilities. The Swedish National Food Agency (Livsmedelsverket) has conducted a study showing that this can be implemented without compromising food safety, animal health, or animal welfare.
The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed development trajectories for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) up to 2030. As a representative of Swedens farmers and forest owners, LRF supports ambitious EU climate goals but urges that targets and methodologies be realistic, science-based, and supportive of both climate, bioeconomy and rural development.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Austrian Chamber of Agriculture · 6 files in common
- FEAD - European Waste Management Association · 5 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 4 files in common
- Cefic · 4 files in common
- Iberdrola S.A. · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 249.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Federation of Swedish Farmers’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.