Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
FPS

Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment

Public authority · Belgium

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Federal in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment filed 2 positions between 28 May 2024 and 9 May 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 28 May 2024PDFsource

The Belgian, federal Environmental product policy unit of the Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment does not support the proposed PEF methodology. The attached comments specifically focus on the proposed modelling of the energy mix.

Correcting act of Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1670 laying down ecodesign requirements for smartphones and tabletsfiled 9 May 2025source

This proposal completely removes removability criteria for the display assembly, even though it has to be provided to end-users. This is not logic. The repairability criteria for the back cover and display assembly should be identical to the criteria that apply for the battery if there is a dependency between these parts during disassembly.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.