EY welcomes the initiatives led by the European Commission (EC) and EFRAG to simplify the ESRS. We focus our comments in the attached cover letter on a small number of priority areas, targeted clarifications, and longer-term considerations as follows.
EY
Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 04458109373-91
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #138 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- ECGI
- AmCham EU
- ecoDa →
- DigitalEurope →
- European Contact Group and Business Europe
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Ernst & Young Core Business Services BV (EY CBS)
- Head office
- Diegem, Belgium
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EY in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EY? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EY filed 10 positions between 11 Mar 2020 and 2 Jun 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 9 times.
What they argued
EY appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments to the Climate Delegated Act (CDA) and the Environmental Delegated Act (EDA). We welcome the efforts of the European Commission to simplify the EU Taxonomy Regulation (EUTR) requirements while retaining its policy objectives.
EY appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on behalf of the EY network on the European Commissions call for feedback on the proposals put forward by the Commission on 17 May 2023 to reform the EU Customs Union.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit these comments on behalf of EY in response to the European Commissions Call for Evidence on policy options to simplify the existing direct tax framework of the European Union and enhance competitiveness within the internal market.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit comments on behalf of EY on the European Commissions call for evidence for an impact assessment of 13 October 2022 on Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT).
We appreciate the opportunity to submit the attached comments on behalf of EY on the European Commissions public consultation of 19 June 2023 on a new EU system for the avoidance of double taxation and prevention of tax abuse in the field of withholding taxes.
EU AML rulebook - feedback collated during a roundtable discussion held with MLROs of main banks in Malta: Outsourcing: one of the prohibitions on outsourcing is in relation to the drawing up and approval of internal policies, controls and procedures which is being interpreted as a prohibition in the outsourcing of the development of AML controls to external third parties - Many firms rely on external third parties…
Dear Sir/Madam EY Europe SCRL (“EY”) wishes to thank the European Commission (the Commission) for the opportunity to comment on its roadmap for a new comprehensive approach to preventing and combating money laundering and terrorism financing.
We welcome the Commission's aim to provide guidance to the wide range of professionals who may seek to perform independent audits under the DSA, an area where assurance practice is at an early stage. However, the draft Regulation raises significant issues for i) potential DSA auditors and ii) audit report users (EU and Member State oversight bodies, civil society, etc). We outline four main areas of concern below.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit comments on behalf of EY on the European Commission’s public consultation on Securing the Activity Framework of Enablers (SAFE). In the attached document we provide our perspective on the issues underlying the questions posed in the questionnaire and the information contained in the “call for evidence”
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EY next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 147.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EY’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.