Europeans for Safe Connections

We, Europeans for Safe Connections (ESC), have the following comments to the document Evaluation and the Regulation : The Evaluation document does not explicitly mention electromagnetic fields (EMF) or the condition of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). The Commissions text focuses almost exclusively on: Administrative burdens and procedural complexity.

Europeans for Safe Connections (ESC) fully concurs with the stated objective of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR) and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR), which is "to establish a robust, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework for medical devices which ensures a high level of safety and health whilst supporting innovation".

We "Europeans for Safe Connections" propose amendments in the article 21 Individual rights of use for radio spectrum. We suggest to add points 6 to 11: 6. When granting rights of use for radio spectrum, Member States shall ensure that such rights are subject to the principle of proportionality. 7.

The three documents provided European Commission (EC) report that the ESC's specific proposals are not accepted, and for the most part, are not mentioned or reported in the EC documents. While the EC documents acknowledge internal criticisms regarding their impact assessment, the core demands of the ESC regarding health-based restrictions on wireless technology are explicitly contradicted by the Commission's…

Digital Networks Act aims to help boost secure high-speed broadband, both fixed and wireless. We "Europeans for Safe Connections" we welcome the emphasis on fixed broadband infrastructure. However, we feel compelled to provide constructive feedback on the health implications of wireless connectivity. Suggestion no. 1: Prioritize cabled connections. Suggestion no.

Digital Networks Act aims to help boost secure high-speed broadband, both fixed and wireless. We "Europeans for Safe Connections" we welcome the emphasis on fixed broadband infrastructure. However, we feel compelled to provide constructive feedback on the health implications of wireless connectivity. Suggestion no. 1: Prioritize cabled connections. Suggestion no.

We Europeans for Safe Connections welcome the intention to curb unethical digital practices and protect vulnerable consumers. At the same time, we stress the importance of ensuring that such measures do not undermine fundamental rights, particularly the right to privacy and the freedom to use end-to-end encrypted communications.

Digital Fairness Act Initiative: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14622-DigitalFairness-Act_en Deadline official: stage 2+3, 17 July 2025 - 09 October 2025 Suggestion for our feedback (max 4000 chars): We "Europeans for Safe Connections" welcome the intention of the Digital Fairness Act to curb unethical digital practices and protect vulnerable consumers.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

We, "Europeans for Safe Connections", are very concerned with this paper. The introduction of the White Paper -How to master Europe's digital infrastructure needs? clearly shows many advantages that are expected from the digital developments. However, in a proper policy document the negative side of developments need to be addressed as well, to achieve the results wanted. Only security threats are called for.

Europeans for Safe Connections welcomes the Commission's efforts to protect biodiversity. Nevertheless, we have a number of important recommendations. The EU lists many causes that threaten biodiversity. However, one is systematically ignored. It is the very important artificial radio frequency radiation (RF-EMV) to which nature is increasingly exposed.

Europeans for Safe Connection welcome this activity. However, we see that legal liability rules are being addressed with delay at a time when many services and products already use some form of AI algorithms. We expect that when AI is implemented in services and products, the protection of life, health and privacy of consumers or those harmed by the negative impacts of AI will be prioritised over manufacturers and…

We, Europeans for Safe Connections, welcome the opportunity to participate in the consultation on the Digital Decade programme. However, we consider it essential that the digitalisation of public services be approached prudently, and with due regard to fundamental rights and public health. Non-discrimination There is no legal obligation for citizens to have internet access or to own internet-connected devices.

Europeans for Safe Connections opposes this proposal, because it promotes acceleration. By its very nature, an acceleration-focused legislative framework reduces the time and opportunity to generate, evaluate and incorporate long-term scientific evidence on impacts on public health and the environment. Acceleration and the precautionary principle pursue different objectives.

1. Evaluation of RF-EMF Exposure and Densification (Agenda Items 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.10, 1.11 & 1.13) The EU position should apply the Precautionary Principle when negotiating new spectrum allocations and emerging communication technologies.

We "Europeans for Safe Connections" endorses that this initiative would help deliver on the European Green Deal with main goal to reduce consumer energy bills and improve the EUs security of supply by reducing primary energy consumption and decreasing energy imports The current regulations ecodesign and energy labelling have reduced the energy consumption of electronic displays.