ESHRE welcomes the Commission’s publication of the Proposal for a Regulation on standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin (SoHOs) intended for human application. While we have already made a number of recommendations for the field of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) during its drafting phase, we would like to use this opportunity to express our position on the published proposal and present…
ESH
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
Other · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 564130542042-64
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #516 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2021
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Biomedical Alliance in Europe (www.https://www.biomedeurope.org/)
- Coalition for Fertility (https://www.coalitionforfertility.eu/)
- Consortium Common Representation of Substances of Human Origin (CoRe SoHO) (https://europeanbloodalliance.eu/european…
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
- Head office
- Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) filed 3 positions between 14 Dec 2020 and 5 Jan 2024, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2020 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
As the world’s leading professional society in human reproduction, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) welcomes the initiative of the EU decision-makers to revise the Union legislation on blood, tissues and cells (BTC).
The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) appreciates the EU4Health programme as one of the EUs key instruments to have a positive impact on public health. In particular, we would like to highlight the positive impact of actions in the field of Substances of Human Origin (SoHO), which contribute to improving the quality and safety of SoHO based treatments, including medically assisted…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.