Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EJF

European Justice Forum

Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 651492324629-52

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1078 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Membership at European Law Institute (ELI)
  • Membership at Fair Civil Justice (FCJ), based and active in the UK

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow European Justice Forum

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at European Justice Forum? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

European Justice Forum filed 2 positions between 14 Oct 2025 and 4 Feb 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 14 Oct 2025PDFsource

Inclusion of the Product Liability Directive (PLD) in the Digital Packages Fitness Check The new PLD extends liability to software, AI, and digital services but has developed independently from other EU digital laws. As a result, EU legislation provides for overlapping responsibilities and inconsistencies in definitions and in evidence rules.

Revision of Regulation (EU)2019/1020 on market surveillance and compliance of productsfiled 4 Feb 2026source

The most effective way to ensure consumer health and safety in the EU is through harmonized standards enforced under the Market Surveillance Regulation (MSR). Companies bear the costs of designing compliant products and securing conformity assessments, while public authorities enforce compliance under the MSR and related rules, including the General Product Safety Regulation (EU 2023/988) (GPSR).

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Justice Forum next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 18.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Justice Forum’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.