We are pleased to submit to the European Commission the proposals of the GOPA Consulting Group related to the current public consultation on the EU Public Procurement Rules. 1. Strengthening Preference for European Products 2. Simplifying and Modernising Procedures 3. Simplifying the concept of sub-contracting 4. Addressing Operational Realities in Third Countries 5.
EHL
European Heritage Label Bureau - GOPA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 604872598330-04
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #406 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- GOPA Partners in Action for Change and Engagement (GOPA PACE)
- Head office
- Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Heritage Label Bureau - GOPA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Heritage Label Bureau - GOPA filed 2 positions between 15 Dec 2025 and 19 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Given the similarities of both initiatives (European Heritage Label and European Capitals of Culture), the EHL Bureau recommends a stronger synergy in order to maximise the EU impact over the European territory related to a stronger sense of belonging to the EU.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Heritage Label Bureau - GOPA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.