Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ECF

European Cyclists' Federation

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 28451455737-18

12
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
10
legislative files
of 665 tracked
9
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #105 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

7.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Transport and Environment (T&E)
  • European Greenways Association (AEVV)
  • Mobilise your City (MYC)
  • Slocat – Partnership on Sustainable, Low-Carbon Transport
  • World Cycling Alliance
  • Clean Cities Campaign

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow European Cyclists' Federation

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at European Cyclists' Federation? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

European Cyclists' Federation filed 12 positions between 1 Dec 2020 and 22 Jul 2026, across 10 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 9 times.

2020 · 1 filed2021 · 3 filed2022 · 3 filed2025 · 3 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

Energy performance of buildingsfiled 30 Mar 2022PDFsource

The European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF) fully supports the European Commission’s proposal to give cycling a much stronger role in the recast of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Cycling is the most-energy efficient mode of transport, and providing easily accessible and secure parking infrastructure is just as critical for its regular use as charging infrastructure is for electric cars.

Energy performance of buildingsfiled 22 Mar 2021PDFsource

ECF, the European Cyclists’ Federation, welcomes the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) as part of the ‘Renovation Wave’ and ‘Fit for 55 Package’. The last EPBD revision in 2018 established the link between the building and mobility sector by providing requirements for charging infrastructure for electric vehicles.

Clean corporate vehiclesfiled 8 Sept 2025PDFsource

The European cycling sector welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the call for evidence for an initiative on clean corporate vehicles, which presents a timely opportunity to advance Europes industrial competitiveness, innovation, and decarbonisation goals.

Road vehicles: maximum weights and dimensionsfiled 18 Feb 2022source

1) ECF would have concerns with road safety if larger Vehicles were allowed generally to cross border. Around 20% of cycling fatalities come about in crash with a large vehicle on European roads https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/document/download/82bfd7e1-b193-4eb3-ad8a-25d474924941_en Research has shown that there would be an increase in blind spots; a decrease in the manoeuvrability and handling both in…

Regulation on machinery productsfiled 3 Aug 2021source

ECF represents the national cycling associations across the EU, thereby representing the users/riders of bicycles and electric assisted bicycles. We see the Electrically Power Assisted Cycle EPAC/Pedelec as a revolutionary mode of transport that has become, and continues to be, a popular choice of transport across the EU.

Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions of transport servicesfiled 16 Dec 2021PDFsource

The European Cyclists' Federation (ECF) welcomes the Commission’s CountEmissions EU initiative. In order to give a complete picture of sustainable transport and mobility options, it is important that active mobility modes like walking and cycling be included in the assessment and compared to other modes of transport and mobility. You can find our detailed feedback and recommendations in the attachment.

Revision of Regulation (EU)2019/1020 on market surveillance and compliance of productsfiled 2 Feb 2026source

1. Introduction EPACs Electric Power Assisted Cycles are becoming increasingly popular, developing into a more accessible, sustainable and inclusive form of cycling throughout Europe. Unfortunately, this positive growth has had one negative side effect due to an increase in unsafe, non-compliant and poorly tested electric bicycles and components entering the market from beyond the EU single market and through the…

Trans-European transport networkfiled 7 Jun 2022PDFsource

We welcome the inclusion in the TEN-T regulation of the definition of “active modes”, the requirement for urban nodes to adopt Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, and including “increase of the modal share of public transport and of active modes” in the additional priorities for urban nodes.

Trans-European transport networkfiled 1 Dec 2020PDFsource

The Inception Impact Assessments correctly points out the need to adapt the TEN-T policy to the decarbonisation objective and other environment-related challenges set out in the European Green Deal. It also correctly recognises insufficient alignment with new transport policy developments and needs, which becomes an obstacle for more efficient and sustainable services.

Collection of urban mobility data per urban nodefiled 19 Nov 2025PDFsource

The European Cyclists Federation (ECF) welcomes the European Commissions initiative to establish common urban mobility indicators for all TEN-T urban nodes and the draft implementing act. We acknowledge the draft act's pragmatic reliance on existing EU data sets to meet the 2027 deadline.

EU tourism strategyfiled 1 Jul 2025PDFsource

Cycling tourism, in its broadest sense (people using a bicycle during their holiday or leisure trips, be it their main motivation or not), is already very popular across the EU, but with marked differences between member states. Cycling tourism positively impacts public health and local economies. It spreads tourism flows and increases the quality of life of tourists and local residents alike.

Update of provisions on European statistics on tourismfiled 22 Jul 2026PDFsource

The European Cyclists' Federation (ECF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Call for evidence for an update of Regulation (EU) No 692/2011 of 6 July 2011 concerning European statistics on tourism. Given the role of cycling tourism as a strategic European sector within the tourism industry, as stated in the European Parliament resolution from 28 April 2026 on enhancing connectivity, preserving cultural…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Cyclists' Federation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 125.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Cyclists' Federation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.