Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EBS

European Biocidal Silver Task Force

Other · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 087556034207-96

1
position filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1161 companies & groups on this site, they rank #902 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2019
in the register since
Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at European Biocidal Silver Task Force? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file European Biocidal Silver Task Force engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from European Biocidal Silver Task Force or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

European Biocidal Silver Task Force filed 1 position on 13 Mar 2023, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Protection of groundwater against pollution and environmental quality standards in the field of water policyfiled 13 Mar 2023PDFsource

The European Biocidal Silver Task Force (the EU STF) takes note of the Commission's proposal to include silver in the Water Framework Directive (WFD)'s list of priority substances. The EU STF considers that: (a) the significant costs associated with including silver in the list will far outweigh its benefits, rendering the proposal disproportionate; and (b) the proposal is unscientific and contains critical errors.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Biocidal Silver Task Force next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Biocidal Silver Task Force’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.