EuroHealthNet welcomes this initiative and strongly supports the goal of reducing cardiovascular premature mortality by 25% by 2035. The Call for Evidence rightly acknowledges that significant inequalities exist between countries, regions, and population groups, that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups face higher cardiovascular risk and poorer outcomes, and that women are at higher risk of misdiagnosis.
EuroHealthNet
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 48562122691-12
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #224 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- https://eurohealthnet.eu/about-us/working-groups-and-alliances/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EuroHealthNet in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EuroHealthNet? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EuroHealthNet filed 3 positions between 8 Feb 2024 and 18 May 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
EuroHealthNet welcomes the Commissions evaluation/review of the AVMSD, including its focus on the rapidly evolving digital media environment, the rise of influencer-led marketing & uneven protection of minors across platforms and Member States. Children & adolescents spend substantial time in digital spaces: 42% are online >2h/day every weekday & 78% on weekends.
EuroHealthNet welcomes the opportunity to provide input toward the mid-term evaluation of the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). In our contribution, we will provide evidence on what works and what does not, feeding to the European Commissions assessment of the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value of the ESF+.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- PHOENIX group · 2 files in common
- COFACE Families Europe · 2 files in common
- European Heart Network · 2 files in common
- European Policy Centre · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EuroHealthNet’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.