As EUPAVE, the representative organization for the concrete paving industry in Europe, we insist that some of the technical screening criteria dealing with the use of concrete for roads should be corrected improved. These former comments, already expressed in 2025n have not been taken into account in the amendments for the revised version of Annex II.
EUP
EUPAVE
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 76295483387-66
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #821 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
< €10K
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EUPAVE is a member of:
- ERF (European Union Road Federation)
- ERTRAC (European Road Transport Research Advisory Council)
- Concrete Europe →
- Moreover, EUPAVE has a Memorandum of Understanding with:
- ISCP (International Society for Concrete Pavements)
- ASCP (Australian Society for Concrete Pavements)
- PIARC (World Road Association).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- EUPAVE - European Concrete Paving Association (EUPAVE)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EUPAVE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EUPAVE? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EUPAVE filed 4 positions between 18 Dec 2020 and 14 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
As EUPAVE, the representative organization for the concrete paving industry in Europe, we believe that some of the technical screening criteria dealing with the use of concrete for roads could be improved. So, we would like to make some specific comments on the following sections: §3.4 (p.
The road is a vital link in transport infrastructure. Harmonisation in quality of the road and operation as well as the capacity of the infrastructure can provide continuous mobility on European corridors. The challenge is to improve the road network in order to ease traffic flow, reduce congestion, reduce journey time and enhance road safety, whilst contributing to decarbonisation.
EUPAVE the European Concrete Paving Association supports the initiative on strengthening military mobility . The need to invest urgently in 4 critical corridors and upgrade essential dual-use infrastructures has been clearly identified. Resilience and resistance to the consequences of climate change have also been identified in the Action plan on military mobility 2.0.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EUPAVE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 22.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EUPAVE’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.