Industry association · France
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Etangs in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Etangs de France? so we know who speaks for it.
Etangs de France filed 2 positions between 22 Aug 2022 and 30 Sept 2025, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.
Fish ponds represent a heritage that is particularly favourable to the 3 objectifs:incendie forest competition, with GHG-free food souiveriness and biodiversity enrichment. However, I know that ponds are never consulted to participate upstream in this kind of reflexion.The community is depriving itself of strong and probant.This lack of knowledge leads to a priori or even negative dogma against ponds.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Dear All, Etangs de France welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop a framework for nature credits. We fully support the ambition to reward landowners, managers, and communities that safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, we note with concern that inland ponds (étangs) are not explicitly recognised in the roadmap, despite their exceptional ecological and socio-economic contributions.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Etangs de France next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 32.
Everything on this page comes from Etangs de France’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.