With this, we urge that the methodology for reporting and accounting for national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from horticultural peat in the Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector wetlands category are to be reviewed in a transparent and unbiased manner. It is not correct to assume that all extracted peat is immediately oxidised, so the instantaneous oxidation method must be refused.
EPA
Estonian Peat Association
NGO · Estonia · EU Transparency Register 074543250490-48
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #1058 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2023
in the register since
Declares membership of
- IPS
- GME
- PA
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- MTÜ Eesti Turbaliit
- Head office
- Pärnu, Estonia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Estonian in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Estonian Peat Association? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Estonian Peat Association filed 2 positions between 8 Nov 2021 and 11 Jul 2024, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2021 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
The present LULUCF system is unfair and incorrect and must be significantly revised. Most importantly, the change in carbon stock is reported when sourcing raw materials, but as a rule, this does not describe the actual greenhouse gas emissions. A change in the carbon stock does not equal emissions!
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Estonian Peat Association next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 30.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Estonian Peat Association’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.