Currently, under the Waste Framework Directive (WFD), companies placing on the market articles or complex objects are required to report information on the substances of very high concern (SVHCs) present in such articles or complex objects in a concentration above 0.1% w/w to European Chemicals Agencys SCIP database.
ESCA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 698168191806-96
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #885 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Small Volume Car Manufacturers Alliance (ESCA)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ESCA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ESCA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ESCA filed 3 positions between 6 May 2026 and 24 Jun 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
ESCA supports the Commission's objective of establishing a harmonised and proportionate framework for battery durability type-approval, building on international regulatory developments, including the latest amendments to UN Regulation No. 154 and UN Regulation No. 83.
ESCA welcomes the Commissions work to define the methods, tests and administrative requirements for type-approval of brake particle emissions of M1 and N1 vehicles. The draft implementing act is a necessary element of Euro 7 implementation and rightly seeks to align the EU administrative framework with internationally harmonised technical requirements, including UN Regulation No 179 on brake emissions.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ESCA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 6.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ESCA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.