EPSO welcomes the European Commission call for evidence Biotech Act II and provides input with the following key recommendations: o Lead Markets: Explicitly include plant-based biomanufacturing; recognise plant-factory-derived inputs in bio-based content requirements.
EPS
European Plant Science Organisation
Other · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 38511867304-09
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 163 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #59 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since
Declares membership of
- ISE - Inititaive for Science in Europe
- GPC - Global Plant Council
- Plant ETP - European Technology Platform 'Plants for the Future'
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Plant Science Organisation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Plant Science Organisation filed 3 positions between 5 Nov 2023 and 28 Sept 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2023 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
EPSO welcomes the move towards a more proportionate regulatory environment for NGT crops. EPSO acknowledges that the proposal is a balanced compromise and supports most of its content, especially the quasi-equivalence of NGT1 plants with conventionally bred ones and the omission of additional labelling requirements beyond the seed labelling.
EPSO welcomes the European Commission Call for Evidence on Category 1 NGT plants and provides input regarding the information necessary for the verification process. A detailed listing of points of the Regulation (EU) 2026/1388 that should be more precise and elaborated in the secondary legislation is attached as pdf file.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put European Plant Science Organisation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 65.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Plant Science Organisation’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.