Please find attached EPRO's feedback regarding the Commission's Draft Act on rules on national registers of producers under the PPWR. We would be pleased to provide further information on the topic covered in this paper and thank the Commission for the opportunity to give feedback.
EPRO
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 376025921978-72
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #445 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- www.ceflex.eu
- www.epbp.org
- www.recyclass.eu
- European Plastic Circularity Coalition
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Head office
- Wemmel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EPRO in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EPRO? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EPRO filed 8 positions between 19 Aug 2025 and 16 Sept 2026, across 8 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
Stakeholders feedback from EPRO and EXPRA. Submitted by EPRO on behalf of EPRO and EXPRA. EPRO and EXPRA support the effort of the European Commission to establishing credit-based mass balance as the method for calculating recycled content from chemical recycling processes. EPRO and EXPRA support a fuel-exempt allocation method and not proportional nor polymer only.
Please find attached joint EPRO and EXPRA feedback to the consultation on the following topics: Plastic packaging harmonisation of rules for calculating and verifying recycled content in plastic packaging (implementing act under article 7(8)). Packaging and packaging waste sustainability criteria for plastic recycling technologies (delegated act under article 7(9)).
Please find attached joint EPRO and EXPRA feedback to the consultation on the following topics: Plastic packaging harmonisation of rules for calculating and verifying recycled content in plastic packaging (implementing act under article 7(8)). Packaging and packaging waste sustainability criteria for plastic recycling technologies (delegated act under article 7(9)).
EPRO and EXPRA members support the development of harmonised end of waste legislation across the Union. The two Associations have prepared a joint Position Paper on the draft Implementing Regulation to develop end of waste criteria (EoW) for plastic, with input from members of both Associations.
Please find attached joint EPRO and EXPRA feedback to the consultation on the following topics: Plastic packaging harmonisation of rules for calculating and verifying recycled content in plastic packaging (implementing act under article 7(8)). Packaging and packaging waste sustainability criteria for plastic recycling technologies (delegated act under article 7(9)).
Please find attached EPRO feedback to the consultation. Key feedback points: 1.We support the inclusion in Annex IIIA of mixtures and wastes classified under entry B3030 and footwear, hats, belts, or other accessories. 2.We call for the inclusion of agricultural plastics included in Annex IIIB. This should be limited to waste shipments within the Union.
The attached paper provides EPRO's feedback on the draft delegated decision on average loss relates. EPRO supports the development of this important secondary legislation which will help ensure a more harmonised approach to calculating recycling rates across the Union. EPRO is an association focussing on plastics circularity.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EPRO next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 176.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EPRO’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.