The European press publishers associations EMMA and ENPA welcome this opportunity to provide their feedback to the Call for Evidence on the Digital Omnibus, which will affect several pieces of legislation of great relevance for the press sector.
EMMA-ENPA
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 37937886834-69
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1518 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #496 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, WAN-IFRA
- Creative Media Business Alliance - http://www.cmba-alliance.eu
- European Advertising Standards Alliance - http://www.easa-alliance.org
- International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisation - IFRRO - www.ifrro.org
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Magazine Media Association (EMMA)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track EMMA-ENPA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at EMMA-ENPA? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
EMMA-ENPA filed 7 positions between 4 May 2021 and 10 Sept 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
The comments by EMMA-ENPA focus on the DNA objective referred in the present Call of incentivising all market players to invest in advanced connectivity. Fully in keeping with its previous feedback, EMMA-ENPA would oppose the potential imposition under the DNA, directly or indirectly and under any form, of a fair contribution by all digital players an option advanced in the 2023 exploratory public consultation.
The European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers Association (ENPA), representing the vast majority of European publishers of newspapers, magazines, periodicals and specialised press, including in digital, appreciate this opportunity to provide its feedback on this Call for evidence, submitted via the document in annex.
EMMA-ENPA written contribution to the Commission’s consultation on the proposed revision of the legislation on the classification, labelling and packaging of chemical substances and mixtures (Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) 1. Introductory remarks The free and independent press is financed to a considerable extent by advertising.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers Association (ENPA), representing the vast majority of European publishers of newspapers, magazines, periodicals and specialised press, including in digital, appreciate this opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commissions Call for evidence support the review of the 2019 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive…
EMMA and ENPA Position paper on the Proposal for a regulation on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector Digital Markets Act 23 March 2021 The European Newspaper Publishers Association (ENPA) and the European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) together represent the majority of European press publishers with a variety of press offerings in magazine and newspaper form, both digital and print.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Please find attached the feedback of the European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA) to the Call for Evidence on the evaluation of the Audio-Visual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). We remain at your disposal for any clarification.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put EMMA-ENPA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 242.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from EMMA-ENPA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.