The comments by EMMA-ENPA focus on the DNA objective referred in the present Call of incentivising all market players to invest in advanced connectivity. Fully in keeping with its previous feedback, EMMA-ENPA would oppose the potential imposition under the DNA, directly or indirectly and under any form, of a fair contribution by all digital players an option advanced in the 2023 exploratory public consultation.
European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA)
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 37937886834-69
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #401 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, WAN-IFRA
- Creative Media Business Alliance - http://www.cmba-alliance.eu
- European Advertising Standards Alliance - http://www.easa-alliance.org
- International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisation - IFRRO - www.ifrro.org
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- European Magazine Media Association (EMMA)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA) filed 4 positions between 4 May 2021 and 25 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
The European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers Association (ENPA), representing the vast majority of European publishers of newspapers, magazines, periodicals and specialised press, including in digital, appreciate this opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commissions Call for evidence support the review of the 2019 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive…
EMMA and ENPA Position paper on the Proposal for a regulation on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector Digital Markets Act 23 March 2021 The European Newspaper Publishers Association (ENPA) and the European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) together represent the majority of European press publishers with a variety of press offerings in magazine and newspaper form, both digital and print.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Please find attached the feedback of the European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA) to the Call for Evidence on the evaluation of the Audio-Visual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). We remain at your disposal for any clarification.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bitkom e.V. · 4 files in common
- EBU-UER (European Broadcasting Union) · 4 files in common
- DIGITALEUROPE · 3 files in common
- ACT | The App Association · 3 files in common
- Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 78.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Magazine Media Association (EMMA) and European Newspaper Publishers' Association (ENPA)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.